Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40966273›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An improved FOX optimization algorithm using adaptive exploration and exploitation for global optimization.

Mahmood A Jumaah, Yossra H Ali, Tarik A Rashid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahmood A JumaahCollege of Computer Science, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6232-3900
Yossra H AliCollege of Computer Science, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
Tarik A RashidDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, AIIC, University of Kurdistan Hewlêr, Erbil, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimization algorithms are essential for solving many real-world problems. However, challenges such as getting trapped in local minima and effectively balancing exploration and exploitation often limit their performance. This paper introduces an improved variation of the FOX optimization algorithm (FOX), termed Improved FOX (IFOX), incorporating a new adaptive method using a dynamically scaled step-size parameter to balance exploration and exploitation based on the current solution's fitness value. The proposed IFOX also reduces the number of hyperparameters by removing four parameters (C1, C2, a, Mint) and refines the primary equations of FOX. To evaluate its performance, IFOX was tested on 20 classical benchmark functions, 61 benchmark test functions from the congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), and ten real-world problems. The experimental results showed that IFOX achieved a 40% improvement in overall performance metrics over the original FOX. Additionally, it achieved 880 wins, 228 ties, and 348 losses against 16 optimization algorithms across all involved functions and problems. Furthermore, non-parametric statistical tests, including the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, confirmed its competitiveness against recent and state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, such as LSHADE and NRO, with an average rank of 5.92 among 17 algorithms. These findings highlight the significant potential of IFOX for solving diverse optimization problems, establishing it as a competitive and effective optimization algorithm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID40966273
PMCPMC12445531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.