Observational studyPloS one2025
Identifying determinants of readmission and death post-stroke using explainable machine learning.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03452813 (Transitions of Care Stroke Disparity Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Transitions of Care Stroke Disparity Study (TCSD-S)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting 30-Day Readmission After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform Predictor Selection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- AI-driven integration of imaging and radiology language improves stroke mortality prediction.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStroke remains a global health challenge with high rates of mortality and rehospitalization placing significant demands on healthcare systems. Identifying factors that determine outcomes of post-hospitalization improves resource allocation. Traditional statistical prediction models are suboptimal for the analysis of complex, multi-dimensional datasets. The objective of our study is to define the extended list of clinical and non-clinical predictors, which we believe can be achieved using Explainable Machine Learning (XML) models as an expansion of conventional methods.
methodsWe evaluated 11 established XML models that represent key ML methodologies to predict 90-day outcomes, namely mortality and rehospitalization among stroke survivors. The study population are 1,300 post-stroke individuals enrolled in the Transitions of Care Stroke Disparities Study (TCSD-S) (NIH/NIMH, NCT03452813) between June 2018 - October 2022. The care after transition data is sourced from participating comprehensive stroke centers and from the Florida Stroke Registry. The analysis incorporated clinical (e.g., age, stroke severity, comorbidities) and non-clinical factors including Social Drivers of Health (SDOH). A combined ranking approach, using Weighted Importance Scores and Frequency Counts, identified significant predictors across models.
resultsThe resulting list of selected predictors included both established clinical factors and non-clinical factors, which enhanced prediction accuracy. Out of 38 identified predictors, 20 are non-clinical variables reflecting the importance of SDOH, environmental factors, and behavioral modifications beyond traditional clinical predictors of death/readmission. A secondary analysis restricted to ischemic stroke patients (n = 1,038) yielded virtually identical predictive performance, indicating robustness of the model within this subgroup.
conclusionsIntegrating SDOH, environmental factors, and behavioral modifications alongside traditional clinical predictors enhances the predictive accuracy of post-stroke outcome models. This underscores the critical role of addressing socioeconomic disparities during post-stroke transitions of care. Moreover, XML models' ability to identify predictors spanning clinical and non-clinical domains suggests their potential to guide recovery. The resulting predictors are crucial for post-hospital care and hold strong potential for identifying individuals at risk of stroke, making them potentially significant across pre-stroke and hospitalization stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.