ArticlePloS one2025
Sugarcane stem node detection with algorithm based on improved YOLO11 channel pruning with small target enhancement.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lightweight real-time detectors of apple-leaf diseases operating on embedded devices.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sugarcane stem node detection is critical for monitoring sugarcane growth, enabling precision cutting, reducing spuriousness, and improving breeding for resistance to downfall. However, in complex field environments, sugarcane stem nodes often suffer from reduced detection accuracy due to background interference and shadowing effects. For this reason, this paper proposes an improved sugarcane stem node detection model based on YOLO11. This study incorporates the ASF-YOLO (Attentional Scale Sequence Fusion based You Only Look Once) mechanism to enhance the feature fusion layer of YOLO11. Additionally, a high-resolution detection layer, P2, is integrated into the fusion module to improve the model's ability to detect small objects-particularly sugarcane stem nodes-and to better handle multi-scale feature representations. Secondly, to better align with the P2 small-object detection layer, this paper adopts a shared convolutional detection head named LSDECD (Lightweight Shared Detail-Enhanced Convolutional Detection Head), which can better deal with small target detection while reducing the number of model parameters through parameter sharing and detail-enhanced convolution. Using soft-NMS (non-maximum suppression) to replace the original NMS and combining with Shape-IoU, a bounding box regression method that focuses on the shape and scale of the bounding box itself, makes the bounding box regression more accurate, and solves the problem of the impact of detection caused by occlusion and illumination. Finally, to address the increased complexity introduced by the addition of the P2 detection layer and the replacement of the detection head, channel pruning is applied to the model, effectively reducing its overall complexity and parameter count. The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. The computational cost decreased from 11.6 GFlops to 6.6 GFlops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.