ArticlePloS one2025
Brief report: Older adolescents and young adults may be at higher risk for changes to menstrual cycle length with COVID-19 vaccination.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing research has consistently demonstrated that adult women experience a small temporary increase in menstrual cycle length following COVID-19 vaccination; however, less is known about whether these changes differ depending on age. The purpose of this study was to assess differences in menstrual cycle length in older adolescent and adult women following an initial COVID-19 vaccine dose compared to an unvaccinated control group, with all analyses conducted across four separate age groups (18-24, 25-29, 30-34, and 35-45). Participants with menstrual cycles averaging 24-38 days prior to vaccination prospectively tracked menstrual cycles using the fertility awareness application Natural Cycles. We compared the within-individual change in menstrual cycle length pre- to post-vaccination in the vaccination group and across four consecutive menstrual cycles in the unvaccinated group, by age. Results demonstrated a 1.11 day adjusted increase in menstrual cycle length for adolescents and young adults (AYAs; ages 18-24), relative to unvaccinated individuals in that age range, while the three older groups all experienced less than a one-day post-vaccination adjusted increase in cycle length compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. These data show that, while COVID-19 vaccination was associated with longer menstrual cycle length for all groups overall, greater increases in menstrual cycle length were observed in AYAs. This suggests that younger individuals are more susceptible to menstrual cycle changes following COVID-19 vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.