ArticlePloS one2025
An implementation science study of a campus-based drug checking service at a Canadian university.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesResearch shows that in countries around the world, unregulated drug use and disorders are more prevalent amongst youth and young adults compared to general adult populations. Further, youth and young adults, including those in post-secondary settings, are increasingly experiencing harms from the global unregulated drug supply. Yet, population-specific harm reduction strategies are limited. This implementation science study explored the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of a post-secondary campus-based drug checking service that was facilitated through intersectoral partnerships and run by students.
methodsThis study used critical social theory and integrated knowledge translation. Data were collected from June to December 2023 through interviews and surveys that utilized the RE-AIM implementation science framework. One-time, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with students (n = 4) who used drugs and/or the campus drug checking service and with program decision makers (n = 7) while student drug checking technicians (n = 6) completed online surveys. Data were analyzed using constant comparison.
resultsService reach was enhanced by a motivation to avoid consuming harmful substances but inhibited by stigma and fears of criminalization, particularly amidst uncertain academic repercussions. Participants reported that the presence and use of student-run drug checking services effectively reduced stigma on campus and the risk of harm for service users and their social networks. Adoption and implementation were facilitated by intersectoral partnerships and associated network expansion and resource sharing opportunities but challenged by inadequate infrastructure. The service was maintained through partnership agreements and individual commitments to engaging with drug checking services.
conclusionThis study contributes valuable insights regarding drug checking in post-secondary settings. These contributions are discussed in the context of young adult health and post-secondary environments, demonstrating how post-secondary institutions might help to overcome challenges in the implementation and delivery of campus drug checking services. The sustainability of such services requires supportive policies, enhanced accessibility, and related evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.