ArticlePloS one2025
Emergent patterns of interaction with dynamic objects.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perception by touch is fundamentally linked to the motor system. A hallmark of this linkage takes the form of stereotyped haptic "exploratory procedures" [1], movement patterns that emerge when people set a perceptual goal such as judging the roughness of a textured surface. This paper expands the study of touch-directed movements by asking what patterns emerge when people encounter and interact with novel objects without explicitly specified goals. Participants were invited to freely interact with an art installation containing novel objects with distinct design features, intended to vary familiarity, structural affordance, and aesthetic response. Objects' affordances were additionally varied over time by utilizing jamming, a physical mechanism that induces changes in stiffness and plasticity. From video recordings, four categories of spontaneous "interactive procedures" differentiated by underlying goals were reliably identified: passive observational, active perceptual, constructive, and hedonic. Perceptual actions were most frequent, indicating an overriding goal of acquiring information about physical properties. The prevalence of other interactive procedures varied across objects, demonstrating the influence of perceptual affordances and prior knowledge. Changes in state further moderated interactions, such that interactions were longer in the stiff/jammed state, and the occurrence of a state change during an interactive procedure lengthened its duration. These findings extend our understanding of haptic exploration beyond explicitly goal-directed contexts, revealing how spontaneous responses in complex and dynamic environments are linked to perceptual outcomes and prior knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.