Trial reportPLoS medicine2025
Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine versus either drug alone for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial from Uganda.
Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04336189 (Optimal Chemopreventive Regimens to Prevent Malaria and Improve Birth Outcomes in Uganda), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimal Chemopreventive Regimens to Prevent Malaria and Improve Birth Outcomes in Uganda
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to prevent malaria and complication-related malaria during pregnancy compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Epidemiology and infection · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on sexually transmitted and reproductive tract infections: results from a randomized trial in Uganda.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Trial
- Sustained high prevalence of multiple antimalarial drug resistance markers in Uganda in 2023-2024.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Natural History and the Burden of Malaria During the First Year of Life in the High-Transmission Setting of Uganda.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
- Effect mechanisms of different malaria chemoprevention regimens in pregnancy on infant growth outcomes: causal mediation analysis of a randomized controlled trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, and their combination on infant outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Sustained High Prevalence of Multiple Antimalarial Drug Resistance Markers in Uganda in 2023-24.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond malaria: can intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine reduce the number of small vulnerable newborns globally?The Lancet. Global health · 2026Review
- Maternal and household risk factors for malaria in pregnancy and low birthweight: a prospective cohort study from Uganda.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- RecurrentmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Maternal and household risk factors for malaria in pregnancy and low birthweight: a prospective cohort study from Uganda.Research square · 2025Article
- A need for new tools for prevention of malaria in pregnancy.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo mitigate adverse consequences of malaria in pregnancy, the World Health Organization recommends intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. However, the effectiveness of IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine has been threatened by widespread Plasmodium falciparum resistance, especially in East and Southern Africa. For IPTp, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine has shown superior antimalarial effects compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, but sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine has been associated with improved birth outcomes compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. We hypothesized that a combination of both dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine would provide superior birth outcomes compared to either drug alone. METHODS AND
findingsWe conducted a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of 2,757 pregnant women in Uganda, where resistance of malaria parasites to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is widespread. Women were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to monthly IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. The primary outcome was the risk of a composite adverse birth outcome defined as any of the following: spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, low birthweight (LBW, < 2,500 g), preterm delivery (<37 weeks), small-for-gestational age, or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes included specific individual adverse birth outcomes, measures of malaria during pregnancy, and safety/tolerability. Combining dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine did not reduce the risk of a composite adverse birth outcome compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (30.0% versus 30.9%, relative risk (RR) 0.97 [95% CI 0.84-1.12]; p = 0.70) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (30.0% versus 26.4%, RR 1.14 [95% CI 0.98-1.33]; p = 0.10). The risk of a composite adverse birth outcome was higher with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (30.9% versus 26.4%, RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.01-1.36]; p = 0.04). Considering individual adverse birth outcomes, combining dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with a higher risk of small-for-gestational age (23.4% versus 18.7%, RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.04-1.51]; p = 0.02) and low birthweight (8.6% versus 5.8%, RR 1.48 [95 CI 1.04-2.12]; p = 0.03) compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and a higher risk of preterm delivery (5.3% versus 3.1%, RR 1.73 [95% CI 1.07-2.79]; p = 0.03) compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. During pregnancy, compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was associated with a 94% reduction in the incidence of symptomatic malaria (0.46 versus 0.03 episodes per person-year, incidence rate ratio 0.06 [95% CI 0.03-0.12]; p < 0.001) and a 97% reduction in the risk of microscopic parasitemia (17.7% versus 0.6%, RR 0.03 [95% CI 0.02-0.05]; p < 0.001), but dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was not associated with improved malaria outcomes over dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone. There were no significant differences in the incidence of any grade 3-4 adverse events between the treatment arms. As this study was conducted in an area of high transmission intensity with widespread resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, findings may not be generalizable to other settings.
conclusionsDespite the superior antimalarial activity of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone was associated with improved birth outcomes. Combining dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for IPTp did not improve birth outcomes compared to either sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04336189; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04336189).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.