SynthesisGerontology2025
Sex-Specific Differences in Ultrasound-Derived Muscle Parameters and Their Associations with Strength and Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Gerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUltrasound technology is a promising tool for assessing muscle condition in older adults. However, sex-specific differences in how ultrasound-derived muscle parameters related to the physical function remain unclear.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus was conducted to identify studies reporting sex-stratified associations between ultrasound-derived muscle parameters and functional measures. Correlation coefficients were transformed using Fisher's z-transformation and analyzed with random-effects models, then back-transformed to Pearson's r. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.
resultsAnalysis of 39 studies revealed that ultrasound-derived muscle parameters were consistently correlated with strength assessments across sexes, including maximal and handgrip strength (males: muscle thickness [MT], r = 0.30-0.42; echo intensity [EI], r = -0.34 to -0.38; females: MT, r = 0.34-0.37; EI, r = -0.34 to -0.35; all p > 0.05). However, for explosive power, both MT and EI had stronger associations in males than females (MT: r = 0.70 vs. 0.42; EI: r = -0.52 vs. -0.27; both p < 0.05). In gait function, MT was positively correlated in females (r = 0.22, p < 0.05) but not in males (r = -0.03, p = 0.62). Additionally, EI correlations were significantly stronger in females than males in the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (r = 0.40 vs. 0.19, p < 0.05).
conclusionThis meta-analysis revealed that MT and EI exhibit comparable correlations with maximal and handgrip strength across sexes. However, both parameters show stronger associations with explosive power in males. In contrast, females displayed more robust associations with physical function, with MT being more strongly linked to gait speed and EI to TUG performance. These findings highlight the need for sex-specific considerations in ultrasound-based muscle evaluations and provide foundational data to inform future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.