ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Pain, Erythema, and Edema After Facial Lifting With Ultherapy Prime or Ultherapy Legacy-A Survey Study.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pain, Erythema, and Edema After Facial Lifting With Ultherapy Prime or Ultherapy Legacy-A Survey Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia.
aimsThe objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy.
methodsA posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy.
resultsThis study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment.
conclusionDespite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.