ArticleJAMA network open2025
Outcomes of Critically Ill Adult Patients With Acute Encephalitis.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of neurologic causes and systemic causes of death in severe meningitis and encephalitis: insights from the international prospective multicenter EURECA study.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes, prognostic factors, and the role of intracranial pressure monitoring in severe community-acquired bacterial meningitis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Vital Prognosis and Causes of Death in Adults with Encephalitis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Risk factors and long-term outcomes in smart syndrome: a multicenter study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Update on infection: from prevention to diagnosis and management.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Nationwide Analysis of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Encephalitis-Related Diagnoses in Ecuador.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Functional outcomes and long-term recovery after severe encephalitis are not well characterized. Objective: To determine the incidence of functional disability or death at 3 months and to describe recovery trajectories through 1 year after encephalitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted across 31 French centers from October 2017 to April 2021 and included adults with probable or confirmed encephalitis and clear cerebrospinal fluid findings requiring care in the intensive care unit. Data analysis was performed between May 2023 and June 2025. Exposure: Causes of encephalitis were categorized into 4 different groups: infectious, autoimmune, other causes, and unknown origin. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was an unfavorable outcome at 3 months, defined by a modified Rankin scale score of 3 to 6, indicating moderate to severe disability or death. Results: Among the 310 patients included (median [IQR] age, 60 [43-70] years; 177 male [57.1%]), 123 (39.7%) were diagnosed with infectious encephalitis, 42 (13.5%) with autoimmune encephalitis, 37 (11.9%) with other encephalitis causes, and 108 (34.8%) with encephalitis of unknown origin. Overall, 161 patients (51.9%; 95% CI, 46.2%-57.6%) had an unfavorable outcome at 3 months, including 84 deaths (27.1%). Independent factors associated with unfavorable outcome included age (odds ratio [OR] per 5-year increment, 1.28, 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.41) and immunocompromised status (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.57 to 6.40), while intravenous acyclovir on the day of ICU admission was associated with a favorable outcome (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.72). The proportion of patients achieving functional independence remained stable from 3 months to 1 year (difference in proportions, 1.1%; 95% CI, -6.9% to 9.2%). Analyses based on encephalitis cause groups revealed that patients with autoimmune encephalitis showed significant improvement through 1 year (difference in proportions, 8.9%; 95% CI, 1.2% to 16.6%), whereas no significant changes were seen in patients with infectious causes (difference in proportions, 1.2%; 95% CI, -6.9% to 9.2%), other causes (difference in proportions, 1.2%; 95% CI: -6.8% to 9.2%), or unknown origin (difference in proportions, -1.9%; 95% CI: -10.0% to 6.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of adults with severe encephalitis requiring intensive care, one-half of patients had an unfavorable outcome at 3 months. Functional recovery at 1 year varied by cause of encephalitis, with patients with autoimmune encephalitis experiencing more favorable outcomes than those with other causes, suggesting a possible role for targeted long-term support in certain cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.