Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40965881›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Prescriptions of Essentially Placebo Treatments Among General Practitioners in 21 Countries.

Fabian Wolters, Kaya Peerdeman, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Limor Adler, Radost Asenova, Petra Bomberová Kánská, Claire Collins, Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Jeremy Howick, Sanda Kreitmayer Peštic and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Fabian WoltersUnit Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Kaya PeerdemanUnit Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jacobijn GusseklooLUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Limor AdlerFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Radost AsenovaDepartment of Urology and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Petra Bomberová KánskáDepartment of Social Medicine, Charles University-Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Claire CollinsIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, Ireland.
Gheorghe Gindrovel DumitraUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Jeremy HowickStoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Sanda Kreitmayer PešticJZNU Dom zdravlja "Dr. Mustafa Šehović" Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Donata KurpasDivision of Research Methodology, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Vanja LazicHealth Center Zagreb-Centar, Zagreb, Croatia.
Heidrun LingnerCenter for Public Health and Healthcare, Department of Medical Psychology, German Center for Lung Research (DZL)/BREATH Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christian D MallenKeele University School of Medicine, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Aristea MissiouResearch Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Lieve PeremansDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Gouverneur Kinsbergen Centrum, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ferdinando PetrazzuoliCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Liina Pilv-ToomInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Rosalinde K E PoortvlietLUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hans O ThulesiusDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Växjö, Sweden.
Péter TorzsaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Rosy TsopraUniversité Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
Victoria TkachenkoDepartment of Internal Medicine of Postgraduate Education and Training Centre of Family Medicine, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Rita ViegasDepartment of Family Medicine, NOVA Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal.
Andrea W M EversUnit Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sven StreitInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: General practitioners (GPs) sometimes initiate a treatment despite not expecting it to improve patients' symptoms by any physiological mechanism. These essentially placebo treatments are ethically controversial, and their frequency is unclear. They involve risks for patients, but to estimate these, more data are needed. Objective: To develop a more precise overview of the rate at which GPs prescribe essentially placebo treatments. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey study included currently practicing GPs from 20 European countries and Israel who responded to online questionnaires. The online questionnaires were taken between December 12, 2019, and August 4, 2021, and analyzed on April 28, 2022. Respondents were contacted by national representatives, either through personal networks (convenience sampling) or an existing database (volunteer sampling). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the rate of essentially placebo prescriptions, given as the rate per week and the proportion of consultations. Secondary outcomes were the associations between this rate and GP background characteristics (gender, age, education about placebos, years of experience, patients seen, and working hours per week). Results: A total of 952 practicing GPs responded (453 of 745 [61%] female; mean [SD] age of 48.02 [11.95] years), and 669 answered all questions. Overall, 689 of 818 respondents (84%) indicated they had prescribed an essentially placebo treatment at least once. Overall, the median (IQR) rate of essentially placebo prescriptions was 0.5 (0.1 to 2.0) per week or 0.67% (0.06% to 2.50%) of consultations. The prescription rate was higher in men (β = 1.94 [95% CI, 0.58 to 3.29]; P = .005), those with more work experience (β = 0.12 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.18]; P < .001), and those who work fewer hours per week (β = -0.08 [95% CI, -0.13 to -0.03]; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of GPs across 21 countries, essentially placebo prescriptions featured in a small minority of consultations, but they nevertheless occurred regularly for most GPs. Rates varied only slightly by GP background characteristics. This suggests that essentially placebo prescriptions were common at a population level, which poses risks for the patient-GP relationship and creates medical risks for patients. Future research should further investigate the decision-making process behind these prescriptions and their effects on patients.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansIsraelMaleMiddle AgedPlacebosSurveys and QuestionnairesPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID40965881
PMCPMC12447254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.