ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2025
Metformin and the Development of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A critical role for mitochondrial dynamics in cigarette smoke condensate-induced RPE senescence.Free radical biology & medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Metformin has demonstrated protective effects in systemic diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and retinal diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy and choroidal neovascularization. Literature suggests metformin may reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), but a consensus has not been reached. Objective: To evaluate the association of metformin with the development of any AMD and progression to geographic atrophy and neovascular AMD using a large electronic health record (EHR) platform. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study had 2 exposed cohorts of participants aged 65 years or older who were prescribed metformin: one without AMD to assess development of any AMD and the other with mild or moderate nonexudative AMD to evaluate AMD progression to geographic atrophy or neovascular AMD. Corresponding nonexposed cohorts consisted of participants not prescribed metformin. Participants were required to meet inclusion criteria at least 6 months before the outcome of interest occurred. Those who had outcomes of interest before meeting inclusion criteria were excluded from analysis. This cohort study used a federated health research platform aggregating deidentified EHR data from 70 institutions (TriNetX). Data were collected from January 2013 to June 2025 and analyzed from September 2024 to June 2025. Exposures: Participants prescribed metformin. Main Outcomes and Measures: Propensity score matching controlled for confounders, such as age, sex, race, hypertension, diabetes, and other systemic conditions. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to compare outcomes at 5 years, 10 years, and any time after meeting criteria. Any confidence intervals that crossed 0.90 to 1.10 were considered statistically not significant. Comparisons between exposed and unexposed groups were repeated requiring a diagnosis of cataract. Results: Before propensity score matching, cohort 1 (no AMD) included 297 008 participants exposed to metformin (mean [SD] age, 74.9 [7.0] years; 157 584 [53.1%] female) and 1 269 644 participants unexposed to metformin (mean [SD] age, 76.8 [7.9] years; 738 640 [58.2%] female). Before propensity score matching in cohort 2 (early or intermediate nonexudative AMD), there were 12 843 participants exposed to metformin (mean [SD] age, 79.5 [7.2] years; 7107 [55.3%] female) and 77 279 participants unexposed to metformin (mean [SD] age, 81.6 [7.2] years; 48 491 [62.7%] female). After propensity score matching, participants prescribed metformin had comparable risk of developing any AMD relative to those not prescribed metformin (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94). When stratified by time, the risk remained similar at 5 years (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99) and 10 years (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94). Similarly, participants prescribed vs not prescribed metformin had a comparable risk of AMD progression over these time spans (RR for geographic atrophy, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-1.01; RR for neovascular AMD, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91-1.17). Conclusion and Relevance: This study suggests that, overall, metformin is not associated with significant development or progression of AMD. Further studies and prospective analyses are necessary to evaluate whether dosage and longevity of metformin use are associated with AMD development or progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.