Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40965830›Full record

ArticleCell biochemistry and biophysics2026

Antiemetic Efficacy of Nodakenin Through Muscarinic, Dopaminergic, and Serotonergic Receptor Modulation: Combined Experimental and Computational Approach.

Towfiqur Rahman, Feroz Khan Nun, Tawfik Rakaiyat Ripu, Md Sakib Al Hasan, Md Shakil Ahmmed, Mohammed Alfaifi, Faisal H Altemani, Abdullah H Altemani, Imam Hossen Rakib, Emon Mia and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Towfiqur RahmanDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Feroz Khan NunDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Tawfik Rakaiyat RipuDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Md Sakib Al HasanDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh. mdsakibalhasan192412@gmail.com.
Md Shakil AhmmedDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Mohammed AlfaifiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal H AltemaniDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah H AltemaniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Imam Hossen RakibDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Emon MiaDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Md Shimul BhuiaDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Muhammad Torequl IslamDepartment of Pharmacy, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh. dmt.islam@gstu.edu.bd.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess the antiemetic activity of nodakenin (NOD) in a chick model using CuSO4.5H2O (50 mg/kg; per orally (p.o.)) to induce emesis and to assess the underlying mechanism via in vivo and silico approaches. NOD was administered orally at three doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg body weight. Conversely, hyoscine (HYO-21), ondansetron (OND-5), and domperidone (DOM-6) were supplied orally as positive controls (PCs). Distilled water (DW) containing 0.9% NaCl and 0.5% Tween 80 was utilized as a negative control (NC) group. PCs and NOD-10 were given to the chicks either separately or in combination to determine whether they had antagonistic or synergistic effects. Molecular docking and visualization of ligand-receptor interactions against D2, D3, 5-HT3, and M1-M5 receptors were performed using computational tools, alongside pharmacokinetic (PK) and drug-likeness assessments of the selected ligands. In vivo results displayed that NOD reduced retches (8 ± 2.09 times) and enhanced latency (106.2 ± 4.46 s) in chicks at middle doses, with better antiemetic effects in combination therapy with HYO. In silico results showed that NOD has the strongest binding affinity (BA) against the D2, 5-HT3, and M4 receptors with scores of − 9.6, − 7.8, and − 9.8 kcal/mol through the creation of hydrogen bonds (HBs) and also showed an acceptable PK profile. In conclusion, NOD exhibits potent antiemetic effects through modulation of muscarinic receptors, warranting further investigation.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsReceptors, DopamineReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, SerotoninAnimalsChickensMolecular Docking SimulationVomitingAntiemeticsReceptors, DopamineReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, SerotoninAnti-emeticMolecular dockingMuscarinic receptorNodakenin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.