ArticleCell biochemistry and biophysics2026
Antiemetic Efficacy of Nodakenin Through Muscarinic, Dopaminergic, and Serotonergic Receptor Modulation: Combined Experimental and Computational Approach.
Article in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to assess the antiemetic activity of nodakenin (NOD) in a chick model using CuSO4.5H2O (50 mg/kg; per orally (p.o.)) to induce emesis and to assess the underlying mechanism via in vivo and silico approaches. NOD was administered orally at three doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg body weight. Conversely, hyoscine (HYO-21), ondansetron (OND-5), and domperidone (DOM-6) were supplied orally as positive controls (PCs). Distilled water (DW) containing 0.9% NaCl and 0.5% Tween 80 was utilized as a negative control (NC) group. PCs and NOD-10 were given to the chicks either separately or in combination to determine whether they had antagonistic or synergistic effects. Molecular docking and visualization of ligand-receptor interactions against D2, D3, 5-HT3, and M1-M5 receptors were performed using computational tools, alongside pharmacokinetic (PK) and drug-likeness assessments of the selected ligands. In vivo results displayed that NOD reduced retches (8 ± 2.09 times) and enhanced latency (106.2 ± 4.46 s) in chicks at middle doses, with better antiemetic effects in combination therapy with HYO. In silico results showed that NOD has the strongest binding affinity (BA) against the D2, 5-HT3, and M4 receptors with scores of − 9.6, − 7.8, and − 9.8 kcal/mol through the creation of hydrogen bonds (HBs) and also showed an acceptable PK profile. In conclusion, NOD exhibits potent antiemetic effects through modulation of muscarinic receptors, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40965830What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.