ReviewJournal of applied genetics2026
Genome-wide association study bridging genomics-phenomics gap in natural plant populations.
Review in Journal of applied genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The planet hosts half a million plant species exhibiting a spectacular diversity of plant forms with genomes driving phenotypic variations. The genome information exists for less than 1% of species, limiting quantitative genomic studies in natural populations. This review explores how recent advances in cutting-edge genomic and phenomic techniques extended genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to wild, non-model species and other natural populations. We also discuss the incorporation of diverse bioinformatic tools into comprehensive in-silico pipelines and recommend implementing machine learning algorithms to address methodological challenges. The critical literature synthesis highlights several scopes of GWAS, bringing natural populations into the spotlight of genomic research. Thus, the study presents GWAS as a cornerstone for advancing quantitative genomics in natural populations. This shift holds great promise for understanding adaptation, trait evolution, and conservation genetics across diverse plant germplasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40965825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.