ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Determination of Patient-Specific Blood Coagulation Kinetic Parameters via Neural Networks: Toward Thrombosis Prediction in Personalized Medicine.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in computational modeling of thrombosis: Bridging mechanistic insights and clinical translation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- External validation of established clinical risk scores for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in a Brazilian registry.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Computational Modeling of Pro-inflammatory Cytokine-Enhanced Blood Coagulation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe solution of the system of equations that model the coagulation cascade enables the determination of thrombin production, which is related to blood clot formation and thrombosis. However, traditional models often overlook clinical and hematological variables due to modeling challenges or incomplete understanding. Mathematical models of blood coagulation cascade are typically generalist, presenting limited accuracy. This study aimed to incorporate patient-specific and hematological data into the kinetic parameters of the coagulation cascade to generate individualized thrombin curves and predict the recurrence of venous thromboembolism.
methodsA sensitivity analysis identified the most influential kinetic parameters for thrombin production. These parameters were adjusted using a model hybrid combining an artificial neural network with a system of ordinary differential equations optimized via a genetic algorithm. The dataset is split into two subsets to prevent data leakage.
resultsEight kinetic rates were identified as the most sensitive, particularly those related to factor V activation and thrombin-antithrombin III complex formation. Factors such as anticoagulant use, smoking, pulmonary embolism, and factor V Leiden mutation significantly impacted the kinetic parameters. The model presented an AUC of 0.9941 and an accuracy of 0.9872.
conclusionThe influence of these input variables on the kinetic parameters and thrombin production aligned with their known effects as risk factors reported in the literature. Adjusting the kinetic parameters individualized the model response, providing a clear cutoff point for thrombosis classification based on thrombin production. With further validation, this model could assist in diagnosing and prognosticating thrombosis and identifying new therapeutic targets to regulate thrombin production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40965812What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.