ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025
Stroke Care in Conflict and War Zones -Peace Saves Lives!
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCardiovascular conditions and related risk factors are an important and common group of diseases. Stroke is a disease that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment, and there are significant inequalities in stroke diagnosis, treatment and follow-up between countries, regions, societies and economic levels. This inequality becomes even more evident in regions where war and turmoil continue. What is the goal of your paper? What questions did you seek to answer? This review aims to explore whether war and armed conflicts impact stroke and care and describe potential mechanisms and solutions. RECENT
findingsThere is some evidence for a relationship between war and stroke epidemiology, clinical presentations, and health system barriers in current and post-conflict settings. Summarize the latest research on your topic. There is increasing research focusing on this subject. War and conflict zones have impact on stroke related to decreased access to stroke care facilities and increassed harmful effects of environmental factors, such as infections and stress. What answers did you find? What are the major takeaways/conclusions of your examination? What's the impact on future research? War imposes a significant neurological burden through direct injury, psychological trauma, infections, and disrupted care. Addressing this requires integrated care models, research investment, and international cooperation to mitigate the long-term disability in post-conflict populations. New systems must be established to reduce war related stroke burden to develop rapid-response neurology and stroke care units in conflict zones, improve tele-stroke and neurology for remote care delivery, and long-term registries for war-related stroke and other neurological outcomes. There is urgent need for stroke surveillance, prevention, and care strategies tailored to war-affected populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40965790What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.