ReviewAdvances in therapy2025
Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Practices, Emerging Trends, and Case-Based Insights.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Routine Frozen Section Analysis May Be Omittable for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Local Flap Reconstruction.Cancers · 2026Article
- Mohs Surgery vs. Wide Local Excision for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Comparing Recurrence Rates, Economic Value, and Aesthetic Outcomes.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a method used to treat skin cancers. It ensures a complete microscopic examination of the tumor margins with the conservation of surrounding tissue, leading to high cure rates and favorable cosmetic outcomes. In each Mohs stage, the excised specimen is frozen and sectioned horizontally, and its margins are evaluated for the presence of malignant cells. A variety of staining methods can be employed, including immunohistochemical. The process is repeated until all margins are negative. The most common indications for MMS are non-melanoma skin cancers, but it is increasingly utilized for other skin lesions, such as melanoma, lentigo maligna, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. A growing body of evidence indicates significantly higher cure rates and a lower risk of local recurrence associated with MMS compared to other surgical modalities. Numerous modifications of the Mohs surgical technique have been developed to enhance the accuracy of margin control and to tackle specific challenges associated with various tumor types. Such alternative approaches include the "spaghetti technique," the "slow Mohs" technique, and other variations such as the Munich method, the square method, the muffin technique, or the perimeter technique. Complications are rare and include infections, bleeding, or impaired wound healing. The increasing popularity of noninvasive imaging, digital pathology, and artificial intelligence models will likely enhance the efficiency of MMS in the future. Machine learning can predict diagnoses, recommend treatment options, predict responses to treatment and potential drug interactions, or help plan surgical procedures, enabling dermatologists to tailor therapies to individual patient characteristics. In addition to presenting the latest trends in Mohs micrographic surgery, this article includes a selection of clinical cases, with an overview of the treatment protocols followed by our institution, as well as data on recurrences based on our clinical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.