ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
The psychometric performance of the EQ-HWB-9 for measuring health and wellbeing in a general population sample from Australia and New Zealand.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the EQ-HWB-9 in a mental health sample and an investigation of modifications to items.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Trial
- Psychometric performance of the experimental EQ-HWB-9 and EQ-5D-5L in the general Chinese population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Qualitative testing of the EQ-HWB-9 with a 'blank' EQ-HWB VAS and EQ-5D-5L with skin bolt-ons in a rare genetic skin disease population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe EuroQol Health and Wellbeing Short (EQ-HWB-9) is a new, generic 9-item instrument, suitable for evaluating interventions in health and social-care settings for patients and caregivers. The instrument now requires validation across general and caregiver populations. Informal caregiving can be time-intensive and impact caregiver's physical and mental well-being. However, caregiver outcomes are often overlooked in healthcare decisions, which can lead to inefficient resource allocation. We aimed to examine the psychometric performance of the EQ-HWB-9 in a general population dataset, including caregivers of persons with disability/chronic illness.
methodsUsing general population samples, stratified by age, gender, region, ancestry, and income for Australia and New Zealand, we investigated EQ-HWB-9 item distribution and known-group validity (t-tests; Cohen's d for effect size, with sub-group analysis by country, gender and age) across sum-scores and UK pilot preference-weighted scores. Item scores were compared across caregiver groups. Convergent validity was assessed between the EQ-HWB-9 and the Kessler-6 using Spearman's Rho.
resultsThe sample included 2542 participants, 2018 from Australia and 524 from New Zealand. Item distribution was similar to previous studies. Known-group validity results aligned to a priori hypotheses for caregiver, mental health, physical health and disability and sleep issues variables. Caregivers had significantly higher scores across each item than their counterparts. Convergent validity conformed to a priori expectations.
conclusionThe EQ-HWB-9 appears valid in this general population setting. This study helps to build the evidence for the use of the instrument across diverse settings. Australian- and New Zealand-specific value-sets would be a good future addition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.