ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025
Multimodal radiomics fusion for predicting postoperative recurrence in NSCLC patients.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Late-Fusion of Radiomics, Clinical Data, and Demographics Enhances Personalized Survival Prediction in NSCLC.Cancers · 2026Article
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Risk factors for misclassification in predicting EGFR mutation status using PET/CT imaging in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostoperative recurrence in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) affects up to 55% of patients, underscoring limits of TNM staging. We assessed multimodal radiomics—positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and clinicopathological (CP) data—for personalized recurrence prediction.
methodsData from 131 NSCLC patients with PET/CT imaging and CP variables were analysed. Radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics (1,316 PET and 1,409 CT features per tumor), with robustness testing and selection yielding 20 CT, 20 PET, and 23 CP variables. Prediction models were trained using Logistic Regression (L1, L2, Elastic Net), Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and CatBoost. Nested cross-validation with SMOTE addressed class imbalance. Fusion strategies included early (feature concatenation), intermediate (stacked ensembles), and late (weighted averaging) fusion.
resultsAmong single modalities, CT with Elastic Net achieved the highest cross-validated AUC (0.679, 95% CI: 0.57–0.79). Fusion improved performance: PET + CT + Clinical late fusion with Elastic Net achieved the best cross-validated AUC (0.811, 95% CI: 0.69–0.91). Out-of-fold ROC curves confirmed stronger discrimination for the fusion model (AUC = 0.836 vs. 0.741 for CT). Fusion also showed better calibration, higher net clinical benefit (decision-curve analysis), and clearer survival stratification (Kaplan–Meier).
conclusionIntegrating PET, CT, and CP data—particularly via late fusion with Elastic Net—enhances discrimination beyond single-modality models and supports more consistent risk stratification. These findings suggest practical potential for informing postoperative surveillance and adjuvant therapy decisions, encouraging a shift beyond TNM alone toward interpretable multimodal frameworks. External validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.