ArticleParasitology research2025
Morphological and genetic polymorphisms in Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille 1806) from the Iberian Peninsula.
Article in Parasitology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Morphological and genetic polymorphisms in Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille 1806) from the Iberian Peninsula.Parasitology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhipicephalus sanguineus is a tick species characterized by high intraspecific variability, even among populations occupying the same habitats. This study investigated whether two distinct phenotypes of R. sanguineus, collected from four geographically separated regions, are associated with specific nucleotide polymorphisms in the mitochondrial cox1 and 16S rRNA gene regions-markers commonly employed in phylogenetic analyses. Morphometric analysis based on established criteria clearly distinguished two morphotypes-Morphotype 1 and Morphotype 2-with statistically significant differences. This morphological differentiation was supported by phylogenetic and genetic divergence analyses, primarily based on mitochondrial cox1 sequences, which revealed six polymorphic sites within the analyzed fragment. Among the identified haplotypes, two-Haplotype 2a and Haplotype 2b-were consistently associated with Morphotype 2. This genetic segregation was confirmed in extended analyses including reference isolates (morphologically and/or genetically defined either as R. sanguineus or R. hibericus). These analyses also demonstrated a close phylogenetic relationship between Morphotype 1 and the R. sanguineus neotype, as well as between R. hibericus and both morphotypes. Although the 16S rRNA marker exhibited lower resolution, it still effectively distinguished the two morphotypes and corroborated the haplotype assignments established by the cox1 phylogeny. The observed genetic divergence (p-distance of 1% in cox1 gene) and the phylogenetic relationship between R. sanguineus and R. hibericus confirmed that R. sanguineus is a polymorphic species, with well-defined haplo-morphotypes, and that R. hibericus is not genetically distinguishable from R. sanguineus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.