Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40965602›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026

Reference values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing-derived parameters for cardiorespiratory fitness in Dutch community-dwelling 55- to 75-year-old adults.

Dax Houtkamp, Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard, Tim Takken, Sabrina Chettouf, Albert Van de Wiel, Ivan Bautmans, Bart C Bongers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dax HoutkampSOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands. d.houtkamp@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4707-8176
Annelies L Pool-GoudzwaardSOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-2516
Tim TakkenDepartment of Medical Physiology, Child Development and Exercise Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7737-118X
Sabrina ChettoufSOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-9035
Albert Van de WielSOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Ivan BautmansSOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-9586
Bart C BongersSOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1948-9788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate interpretation of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) requires reference values that account for sex, age, and body composition. Existing reference values often lack these distinctions or exclude older adults. This study aimed to establish sex- and age-specific reference values for absolute and relative (body mass-corrected and lean body mass-corrected) CRF parameters derived from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in Dutch community-dwelling 55- to 75-year-old adults.

methodsCross-sectional data from 611 participants of the AMCOHF study were analyzed. CRF was assessed via cycle ergometer CPET evaluating oxygen uptake (V̇O

resultsAll CRF variables declined with age. V̇O

conclusionThis study provides reference values for V̇O

Indexed as

Cardiorespiratory FitnessExercise TestAgedAnaerobic ThresholdCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOxygen ConsumptionReference ValuesAgingAnaerobic thresholdCardiopulmonary exercise testOxygen consumptionPhysical fitnessReference values

Identifiers

PMID40965602
PMCPMC12948906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.