ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2025
Diet shifts alter the activity and distribution of digestive enzymes in an herbivorous fish.
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feeding Habits of Narrow-Clawed CrayfishAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Physiological and Intestinal Microbiota Responses to the Feeding Stimulant Dimethyl-β-Propiothetin (DMPT) in Aquatic Animals-A Preliminary Study onAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digestion is primarily performed by digestive enzymes. Here, we examined the activity levels of seven digestive enzymes along the digestive tract of the herbivorous fish, Cebidichthys violaceus. We reared C. violaceus on carnivore, omnivore, and herbivore diets in the laboratory for nine months and compared the digestive enzyme activities among the fish on the different diets and with wild-caught fish consuming their natural foods. Enzymatic activities were generally lower in the laboratory than in wild-caught fish. The marked anterior-to-posterior amylase activity gradient along the gut in wild-caught fish was absent in the lab-fed fish. We hypothesize that the dampened enzymatic activity may have been caused by reduced food intake in the laboratory in comparison to the wild fish. N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase) activity (degrades chitin breakdown products) peaked in the distal intestines of the lab-fed fish, but not the wild fish. The role of this enzyme in the digestive process remains unknown since the lab diets contained no chitin, and its origin may have been microbial. Overall, C. violaceus can tolerate diets with a wide range of protein and carbohydrate levels. However, the totality of our data suggests that live algal diets may be best for this herbivorous fish in a captive setting, especially for aquaculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.