ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Impact of Periampullary Diverticulum on ERCP Outcomes and Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study was aimed to investigate the impact of periampullary diverticulum (PAD) on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures and the recurrence of common bile duct stones (CBDS).
methods830 CBDS cases with native papilla were finally enrolled in the study, including 239 cases with PAD (type I, type II, and type III). Procedures and complications of ERCP were compared between the two groups. The patients with successful stone removal were followed up every 6 months until December 31, 2023.
resultsThe successful cannulation rate in the PAD group (96.7%) and type I PAD group (76.9%) was lower than that in the non-PAD group (99.2%). PAD was associated with a wider bile duct diameter, larger stone size, and a higher rate of cannulation with double guidewires, endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and mechanical lithotripsy during the ERCP procedure. The incidence of complications did not differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that PAD (OR = 3.265, 95%CI: 1.854-5.751) was an independent risk factor for the recurrence of CBDS.
conclusionPAD, especially type I PAD, may impact ERCP cannulation success rates. Additionally, PAD increases the complexity of stone extraction and is associated with CBDS recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40965561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.