ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2025
Epidemiology of metatarsal fractures in Shropshire 2020-2023.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The epidemiology of metatarsal fractures remains poorly understood. We identified retrospectively all adults with ≥ 1 radiologically confirmed metatarsal fracture, over 3 years. Young men and women had similar fracture rates, but overall risks were significantly higher for women (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.76-2.26), driven by age-related falls in male fracture incidence. PURPOSE: Metatarsal fractures are clinically and economically important and may reflect trauma, insufficiency or fatigue. However, their epidemiology remains poorly understood. We evaluated radiologically confirmed metatarsal fractures identified within Shropshire over a 3-year period.
methodsRadiology reports were searched for all patients aged ≥ 18 years between 2020 and 2023, using the terms 'metatarsal' AND 'fracture', to identify patients with ≥ 1 confirmed metatarsal fracture. Age at fracture, sex, fracture description and mechanism were recorded, and population fracture rates estimated, using local census data.
resultsA total of 1121 (758 female) individual patients aged 50.7 (18.9) years, fractured 1370 metatarsals, usually the fifth in isolation, with fewer individuals fracturing two, three or four metatarsals. Fractures were located at the metatarsal base (59%), shaft (26%), neck (12%) or head (3%); were mostly oblique, transverse or comminuted; and were usually caused by low-energy inversion injuries or falls. Fracture rates per 100,000 were 105 for women aged 18-29 years, rising to 153 and 142 in the sixth and ninth decades, with comparative male rates of 102, 40 and 31. Overall, women had more metatarsal fractures than men (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.76-2.26), the sex difference being highest for metatarsal head fractures (RR 2.98 95% CI 1.34-6.60) and lowest for shaft fractures (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.32-2.12).
conclusionMost metatarsal fractures are isolated low-energy injuries of the fifth metatarsal. Overall, women suffer twice as many fractures as men, driven by sustained high fracture rates in older women and a steep age-related decline among men. The underlying reasons for this pronounced sex difference are unclear and require further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40965557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.