ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Outcome of acromegalic patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery: collaborative French and Italian cohort, a 25-year experience.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current treatment landscape of acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Beyond the MRI-positive/MRI-negative dichotomy: A stepwise surgical strategy for Cushing's disease.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been demonstrated that high expertise is crucial for pituitary surgery. Due to the low incidence of acromegaly, large data reporting the outcome of endoscopic surgery are limited. The objective was to evaluate the outcomes of acromegalic patients undergoing endoscopic surgery. This retrospective study included 822 consecutive acromegalic patients treated by endoscopic endonasal surgery by two expert French and Italian neurosurgical teams from 1998 to 2022. The primary outcome was postoperative endocrine remission. The secondary outcome was operative morbidity, including surgical complications and new endocrine deficits. Preoperative predictive factors of persistent postoperative hypersecretion were calculated. Mean follow-up was 46.3 months. The overall remission rate was 63%. Long-term remission was achieved in 202/230 (88%) enclosed microadenomas, 316/452 (70%) macroadenomas without obvious cavernous sinus invasion, and 3/140 (2%) obvious invasive tumors. Hematoma, nerve palsy, cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis and epistaxis occurred in 0.1%, 0.1%, 1%, 0.6% and 1.1% respectively. New anterior pituitary deficits and diabetes insipidus occurred in 25/822 (3%) and 30/822 (3.6%) of patients respectively. Age, obvious cavernous sinus invasion, and larger diameter were predictive of persistent hypersecretion in multivariate analysis. Recurrence of somatotroph hypersecretion occurred in 19/540 (4%) patients with early remission, with a mean time of 37.5 months. Endoscopic pituitary surgery is effective and safe for acromegaly, provided that patients are treated in tertiary reference centers. Remission rate is high in microadenomas. If normalized somatotroph axis is achieved after surgery, long-term remission can be expected in most patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40965517What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.