ArticleJournal of vision2025
Transient increases to apparent contrast by exogenous attention persist in visual working memory.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sensory recruitment hypothesis posits that Visual Working Memory (VWM) maintenance uses the same cortical machinery as online perception, implying similarity between the two. Characterizing similarities and differences in these representations is critical for understanding how perceptions are reformatted into durable working memories. It is unknown whether the perceptual appearance effect brought by attention is maintained in VWM. We investigated how VWM depends on attentional state by examining how transient modulations from reflexive (exogenous) attentional orienting affect the appearance of VWM representations; particularly whether VWM takes a "snapshot" at the time of encoding, or transient attentional dynamics continue into VWM. Specifically, we assessed whether the transient modulation to perceived contrast caused by exogenous attention is preserved when attended stimuli are encoded and maintained in VWM. Observers performed a delayed contrast comparison task in which one stimulus had to be held in VWM across a delay and compared to a second stimulus. Exogenous attention was manipulated through transient pre-cues appearing above the location of the first, second, or both stimuli before their onset. Model comparisons revealed that the transient attentional boost to perceived contrast persisted in VWM across the delay. This result indicates that VWM maintains a "snapshot" of the attentional-modulated perceptual representation at the time of encoding and suggests that attentional effects on vision enable us to select and protect in VWM visual information relevant to cognition and action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.