Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40965418›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2025

Wound Care Knowledge of Community Pharmacists and Pharmacy Staff: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Daisy H K Cheung, Carl R Schneider, Jack C Collins, Irene S Um

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daisy H K CheungThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-9833
Carl R SchneiderThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-5609
Jack C CollinsThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Irene S UmThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds pose a public health challenge, with community pharmacists increasingly recognised for their potential role in wound care. Since all chronic wounds originate from acute wounds, pharmacists can play a proactive role in preventing chronicity. Assessing pharmacy staff's wound care knowledge is essential as initiatives to enhance their involvement are underway in Australia. This study aimed to assess wound care knowledge among pharmacists and non-pharmacist staff in Australian community pharmacies. A national cross-sectional electronic survey was conducted between January and August 2022. Developed with multidisciplinary experts, it assessed understanding of wound healing, referral protocols, wound identification, management, and dressing selection. Descriptive and content analyses were performed, and multivariate linear regression identified predictors of knowledge scores. Of 120 responses, 70% were pharmacists, 14% non-pharmacist staff, and 16% unspecified. The median knowledge score was 27 out of 37 (IQR = 21, 30; range = 5-37). Profession, experience, and prior training were significant predictors of higher scores (p < 0.001, R

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunity Pharmacy ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacistsWound HealingWounds and InjuriesAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescommunity pharmacy servicesknowledgepharmacistspharmacy technicianswounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID40965418
PMCPMC12445117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.