Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40965386›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2025

Predominant Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Michael LaLoggia, Nikita Jhawar, Charbel Nakhoul, Anupam Kumar, Harry Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael LaLoggiaDepartment of Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA. Electronic address: laloggia-michael@cooperhealth.edu.
Nikita JhawarCooper Heart Institute, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
Charbel NakhoulDepartment of Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
Anupam KumarDepartment of Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA; Cooper Heart Institute, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
Harry WangDepartment of Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA; Cooper Heart Institute, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically significant cardiac sarcoidosis is rare, seen in 5% of patients with sarcoidosis. Predominant right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is seen even less often. CASE SUMMARY: A 59-year-old man presented to the emergency department from his outpatient cardiologist's office with high-grade atrioventricular block and signs of right-sided heart failure. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed normal left ventricular systolic function, with severe RV enlargement and dysfunction. Right heart catheterization revealed mild postcapillary pulmonary hypertension and disproportionate RV dysfunction. A transbronchial biopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes showed noncaseating granulomas, consistent with sarcoidosis. DISCUSSION: RV dysfunction in sarcoidosis is most often secondary to lung disease or left heart disease. In general, RV systolic dysfunction is associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients with sarcoidosis. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: In patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and predominant RV dysfunction, clinical context along with multimodal imaging, particularly cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, can be useful to reach a diagnosis and provide prognostic value.

Indexed as

cardiac sarcoidosishemodynamicsmultimodal imagingright heart catheterizationright ventricular dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40965386
PMCPMC12790195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.