ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2025
Multi-site HPV infection in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an exploratory analysis.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity is associated with cervical, oropharyngeal, and anal cancers. There is insufficient published evidence regarding the effectiveness of obtaining oropharyngeal and anal swabs from patients with cervical HPV positivity to detect potential pathologies. Our aim was to analyze the feasibility of this potential screening protocol in a pilot group. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional exploratory analysis, women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 1, 2, or 3 were recruited. In order to evaluate HPV infection beyond the cervix, oropharyngeal and anal swab samples from HPV-positive women presenting to the obstetrics and gynecology clinic with histopathologically confirmed CIN were collected. Results: A total of 30 women who provided informed consent were included in this pilot study. HPV 16 was the predominant cervical HPV type across all CIN grades (46.7% of cases), but HPV genotype did not significantly correlate with the severity of CIN lesions (p=0.786). No statistically significant association was found between cervical and anal HPV infections (p=0.427). Oral HPV positivity was rare (6.7%) and similarly showed no significant correlation with cervical HPV infection (p=0.499). Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary data on the effectiveness of multi-site HPV screening in this population. Future larger-scale studies are needed to determine whether detecting extra-cervical HPV in women with cervical HPV positivity will influence clinical management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.