ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025
Overview of European Practices for Management of Tyrosinemia Type 1: Towards European Guidelines.
Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- SIADH as an Underrecognized Manifestation of Porphyria-like Crises in Hereditary Tyrosinemia Type 1: Clinical and Pathophysiological Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Monitoring of Patients With Hereditary Tyrosinemia Type 1-A Belgian Monocentric Experience.JIMD reports · 2026Article
- Overview of European Practices for Management of Tyrosinemia Type 1: Towards European Guidelines.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of nitisinone (NTBC) and newborn screening for Tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) enabled preemptive treatment of patients, thereby significantly improving outcomes by preventing liver, kidney, and neurological issues. Treatment goals have shifted from emergency treatment to long-term care. To evaluate the risk of developing complications with aging, due to TT1 itself or its treatment, long-term follow-up is essential. In 2014, an overview of TT1 management practices in Europe was published. Within the Metabolic European Reference Network's subnetwork on amino-and-organic acidurias (MetabERN-AOA), we considered it important to give an update on current TT1 management practices in Europe. An online survey study was performed among members of the MetabERN-AOA subnetwork, and participants of a workshop on TT1 at the European Metabolic Group Meeting of Nutricia. Findings were compared to existing data from the aforementioned publication from 2014 and previously published recommendations. Thirty-two centers (16 European countries) completed the survey. Both consistencies and inconsistencies in TT1 management were seen. Inconsistencies were observed in the frequency and methods of follow-up, dosing of NTBC, and target ranges of biochemical markers. Compared to 2014, key differences included an increased number of patients detected by newborn screening, lower NTBC dosing, and a shift from interest in mainly hepatic to hepatic and neurocognitive outcomes. These results align with trends seen in TT1 recommendations over the years. In addition to numerous consistencies, many aspects in TT1 management still differ widely across Europe, suggesting the need for uniform guidance in clinical management beyond existing recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.