ArticleCancer medicine2025
EGFR Mutation Detection in Whole Slide Images of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Using a Two-Stage Deep Transfer Learning Approach.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer is the most frequent and includes adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Currently, LC treatment is based on tumor molecular profiling. LC may display Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. Detecting mutations in the EGFR gene is crucial for the tyrosine kinase inhibitory therapy.
methodsThis study used a computer-based methodology with two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) based on InceptionResNet-V2, applied to Whole Slide Images, to distinguish healthy from cancerous tissue and then EGFR mutated tumor tissue samples. We also integrated an Explainable AI technique (Grad-CAM) to clearly visualize insights into the model's decision-making process. The analysis was conducted on 259 LC cases collected from three different centers (Florence, Rome, and Sassari).
resultsThis methodology achieved an accuracy of 96.17% in distinguishing healthy from cancerous tissue, with specificity of 87.89%, sensitivity of 98.43%, an F1 score of 97.59% and an AUC of 0.99. Additionally, Cohen's Kappa indicated a consistency of 0.7982, and the confusion matrix showed a correct classification rate of 96.2%. For EGFR mutation detection in cancer tissue, slide-level performance after aggregation reached an accuracy of 76.67% with specificity of 80.77%, sensitivity of 73.53%, an F1 score of 78.12%, a consistency of 0.5583 of Cohen's Kappa and an AUC of 0.77. The confusion matrix showed 76.7% as a correct classification rate.
conclusionThe two tested CNNs showed potential for assisting LC diagnosis, especially in distinguishing healthy from tumor tissue. While the direct detection of EGFR mutational status remains challenging, the results suggest that relevant predictive signals can still be extracted from routine H&E slides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.