Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40965314›Full record

ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2026

Ethical Issues Involved in Solid Organ Xenotransplantation.

Daniel J Hurst, Chris Bobier, Luz A Padilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetically engineered porcine liver: a new era in transplantation.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Ethical Issues Involved in Solid Organ Xenotransplantation.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel J HurstDepartment of Medical Education and Scholarship, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0592-2592
Chris BobierCollege of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-4721
Luz A PadillaDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4032-044X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenotransplantation (specifically, genetically modified pig-to-human transplant of organs, tissues, or cells) clinical trials are set to begin in the United States after decades of pre-clinical studies and recent decedent and compassionate use investigations. This article provides a primer on the key ethical issues attendant with this emerging therapy. We explore four central areas of concern: (i) the use of animals to meet human transplant needs, as well as their welfare since they are housed in non-natural conditions, (ii) the risk of infectious disease transfer from the porcine graft to the human recipient, known as xenozoonosis, (iii) patient selection criteria for initial clinical trials when an unknown risk/benefit ratio exists, and (iv) the necessity of public engagement in order to increase acceptance and trust of this novel potential therapy. The article argues that the long-term success and social acceptance of xenotransplantation are contingent not only on overcoming immunological hurdles but also on thoughtfully considering the ethical issues.

Indexed as

Transplantation, HeterologousAnimalsHumansPatient SelectionSwineanatomy and histology/ethicsanimalsclinical trialsethicsgenetically modified/ethicsorgans xenotransplantation/ethicsorgan transplantation/ethics

Identifiers

PMID40965314
PMCPMC12747646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.