ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2025
Antibiotic Prescribing for Cellulitis in the Absence of Penicillin-Cephalosporin Cross-Reactivity Alerts: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Prescribing for Cellulitis in the Absence of Penicillin-Cephalosporin Cross-Reactivity Alerts: A Retrospective Study.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cephalosporins are often avoided in patients with penicillin adverse drug reaction (ADR) labels. In our institution's electronic medication management system, penicillin and cephalosporin ADR labels do not generate cross-reactivity alerts. Penicillins and cephalosporins are preferred treatments for cellulitis. We aimed to describe penicillin, cephalosporin, and non-penicillin, non-cephalosporin (NPNC) prescribing for inpatients with cellulitis in the presence/absence of penicillin and/or cephalosporin ADR labels. Index cellulitis admissions were included from 2017 to 2024 where at least one penicillin, cephalosporin, or NPNC was administered, and were categorized according to the presence/absence of penicillin and/or cephalosporin ADR labels. Penicillin, cephalosporin, and NPNC prescribing was compared between groups with and without labels using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Of the 8374 included index admissions, 7567 had no penicillin/cephalosporin labels, 729 had penicillin-only labels, 42 had cephalosporin-only labels, and 36 had both labels. Inpatients with penicillin labels were significantly more likely (OR 13.07; 95% CI, 11.05-15.45) to be prescribed cephalosporins than those without labels. There were no differences in penicillin prescribing between those with cephalosporin labels and those without labels (OR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.44-2.47). Inpatients with penicillin and/or cephalosporin labels were 6 to 52 times more likely to receive NPNC antibiotics than those without labels. The absence of cross-reactivity alerts was associated with increased cephalosporin use for cellulitis in inpatients with penicillin ADR labels, sparing NPNC antibiotics that may be less effective. The removal of cross-reactivity alerts may be effective for increasing cephalosporin prescribing for inpatients with penicillin ADR labels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.