ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2025
The Effect of Using Smart Glasses Integrated Ultrasonography in Radial Artery Catheterization: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The use of ultrasonography (USG) in arterial catheterization, in which the comfort of the practitioners and hand-eye coordination are very important, is frequently needed by anesthesiologists in daily practice. We aimed to investigate whether radial artery catheterization with smart glasses-integrated USG would increase success and satisfaction. Methods: One hundred twenty patients who were >18 years old and would have undergone elective surgery with an indication for radial artery catheterization between August and December 2022 were included in this prospective randomized study. Patients who underwent catheterization in the last month and had contraindications were excluded. In the Standard USG Group, catheterizations were performed with standard USG, and in the Smart Glass Group, with smart glasses-integrated USG. Two anesthetists, a junior practitioner with experience with 20-50 catheterizations and a senior practitioner with experience with over 50 catheterizations, performed the catheterizations. The subcutaneous distance, radial artery depth, and diameter in short axis, catheterization time, and ergonomic satisfaction were recorded. Results: Sixty patients in standard USG group and 59 patients in Smart Glass Group, with similar demographics, were included in statistical analysis. The mean first catheterization time by junior practitioners, with smart glasses integrated USG, was shorter than standard USG (49.07±29.91 sec vs. 99.73±75.18 sec, Conclusion: Radial artery catheterization with smart glasses integrated USG shortens catheterization time, and increases satisfaction by increasing the comfort of USG use for junior practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.