Trial reportActa ophthalmologica2026
Fluid/function correlation using AI-based quantification versus central subfield thickness in treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients with neovascular AMD in a real-world setting.
Trial report in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Choriocapillaris Flow-Enriched Prediction of Retinal Sensitivity Using OCT-Derived Biomarkers in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Loading dose and 12-month outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with faricimab, with AI-based analysis of fluid dynamics.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Short-term outcomes of intravitreal faricimab on refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the association between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and quantitative macular fluid volumes, compared to central subfield thickness (CST) in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with active neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Baseline data were collected from 290 eyes of 290 participants consecutively enrolled in a prospective, randomized phase III clinical trial. Intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) volumes were quantified and localized using an MDR-certified AI algorithm (Fluid Monitor, RetInSight). Fluid volumes and CST were included in linear regression models for comparison.
resultsSignificantly greater IRF volumes within each macular region were observed in treatment-naïve patients, whereas larger PED volumes contributed to higher CST values in pretreated patients. In both subgroups, the largest proportion of BCVA variance could be explained by measuring IRF and SRF volumes within the entire 6-mm area (adjusted R
conclusionThe examination of IRF and SRF volumes significantly impacts BCVA in nAMD. The weaker association of CST highlights its limitations as a parameter of disease activity. These findings emphasize the necessity of distinct fluid volume quantification as a relevant surrogate for visual function loss or benefit in nAMD, with particular emphasis on treatment duration and fluid in regions beyond the central 1-mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.