ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2025
Effectiveness and Safety of Reduced-Dose and Slow-Infusion Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Regimen in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism at Intermediate-High Risk.
Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interventional Management of Intermediate-High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Current Evidence, Patient Selection and Personalised Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From Clusters to Outcomes: Machine Learning-Based Phenotyping in Intermediate-High-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Prolonged Infusion Thrombolysis With rt-PA for Acute Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Refractory Hypoxemia as a Trigger for Systemic Thrombolysis in Intermediate-High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntermediate-high-risk (IHR) pulmonary embolism (PE) is defined by right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and elevated cardiac troponin in the absence of hemodynamic instability. While full-dose thrombolysis may improve outcomes, it poses a high bleeding risk. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of a reduced-dose, slow-infusion thrombolytic regimen.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 124 patients with acute IHR PE who met at least one of the following criteria: systolic blood pressure ≤110 mm Hg, heart rate >100 bpm, SpO2 <90% on room air, respiratory rate >20/min, or lactate >2 mmol/L. Patients with contraindications to thrombolysis or symptom onset >14 days were excluded. Patients received 25 mg intravenous alteplase (t-PA) infused over 4-6 hours, along with standard anticoagulation according to the institutional protocol. Following the initial dose, a repeat infusion of 25 mg over 4-6 hours was administered if tachycardia, hypoxia, or signs of organ hypoperfusion persisted on re-evaluation.
resultsSyncope was the presenting symptom in 27.4%, and 49.2% had deep vein thrombosis. Median t-PA dose was 50 mg and median infusion duration was 6 hours. Significant improvements were observed in RV and RA size/function, thrombus burden, and clinical parameters (all P < .001). Qanadli score and RV/LV ratio decreased by 55% and 29%, respectively. Major and minor bleeding occurred in 4.8% and 3.2%. In-hospital mortality was 4.8%; 12-month survival was 89.5%. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension developed in 3.2%.
conclusionLow-dose, slow-infusion t-PA therapy appears effective and well-tolerated, offering hemodynamic and clinical benefit with fewer bleeding complications in patients with IHR PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.