Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964970›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

Individual-Level Effects of a Digital Behavioural Treatment for Chronic Pain: Proof-of-Concept of a Single-Case Experimental Design Study.

Haya Al Sharaa, Sara Laureen Bartels, Afra S Taygar, Linnéa Engman, Suzanne Petersson, Ida Flink, Katja Boersma, Lance M McCracken, Laura Simons, Johan W S Vlaeyen and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haya Al SharaaDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0644-9859
Sara Laureen BartelsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Afra S TaygarDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linnéa EngmanDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Suzanne PeterssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ida FlinkDepartment of Social and Psychological Studies, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Katja BoersmaSchool of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Lance M McCrackenDivision of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Laura SimonsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Johan W S VlaeyenExperimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Patrick OnghenaMethodology of Educational Sciences Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rikard K WicksellDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

AFA försäkring 190252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain affects 20%-30% of the population worldwide, leading to significant distress, disability and financial burden. Pain management strategies focusing on pain reduction have shown limited effects on functioning; however, behavioural treatments aimed at enhancing resilience have demonstrated strong empirical support. Digital solutions offer new opportunities for delivering evidence-based treatments, but evaluation at the individual level is needed. The aim of this study is to examine individual-level treatment effects of a digital behavioural treatment for chronic pain in a heterogeneous sample.

methodsA study with a single-case experimental design (SCED) was conducted with participants (N = 11) experiencing chronic pain (> 3 months) recruited through healthcare. Participants were randomised at baseline (5-10-day A-phase) and completed a 6-module digital treatment based on learning theory and well-established theories applied to chronic pain (6-8-week B-phase), with weekly therapist contact. Digital diaries, prompted twice daily, tracked psychological flexibility and acceptance, pain-related functioning, pain intensity and well-being. Data were analysed using visual analysis and effect size calculations.

resultsN = 11 enrolled and data from n = 10 were analysed (n = 1 refused digital diary, n = 2 partial completers, n = 8 full completers). Pain profiles varied (e.g., chronic migraine, fibromyalgia, lower back pain, etc.). Several participants benefited from the treatment, though results varied across individuals and across outcomes.

conclusionThe digital behavioural treatment showed promise in addressing diverse pain profiles and associated functioning. The variability in responses highlights the benefit of using SCED to explore individual-level effects, thus offering a methodological proof-of-concept. Findings support further development, including tailoring to match individual needs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This proof-of-concept study provides support for the utility of digital behavioural interventions and individual-level evaluation of treatment effects, highlighting the potential of personalised pain treatments. The findings contribute to the growing body of support for digital solutions as effective and accessible approaches to improve functioning and resilience for people with diverse pain experiences.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyChronic PainPain ManagementAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProof of Concept StudySingle-Case Studies as TopicTreatment Outcomechronic paincognitive behavioural therapydigitalN‐of‐1self‐managementsingle‐case experimental design

Identifiers

PMID40964970
PMCPMC12444821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.