ArticleAnnals of neurology2026
A Digital Measure of Eye Movements During Reading Sensitively Captures Oculomotor and Speech Dysfunction, Early Changes, and Disease Progression in Ataxias.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An International Survey of Patients with Ataxia: Trends in Patient-Reported Symptoms.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Hereditary Ataxias: From Pathogenesis and Clinical Features to Neuroimaging, Fluid, and Digital Biomarkers-A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSensitive behavioral measures are needed for clinical trials in ataxias and other neurodegenerative diseases. We hypothesized that quantitative analysis of eye movements during a natural multi-component task (passage reading) could produce a measure capable of capturing subclinical signs and disease progression.
methodsBinocular gaze sampled at 1000 hertz (Hz) was collected from 102 individuals with ataxia (including 36 spinocerebellar ataxias, 12 Friedreich's ataxia, and 5 multiple system atrophy) and 70 healthy controls. Longitudinal data were available for 26 participants with ataxia in the ongoing Neurobooth natural history study. The Reading Eye Abnormality Digital (READ) score was developed by training a regression model to aggregate saccade and fixation kinematics.
resultsMean displacement of fixations, the number and frequency of saccades, and the proportion of regressive saccades were related to oculomotor dysfunction, speech dysfunction, and overall ataxia severity. The READ score was reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96, p < 0.001) and correlated with Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS) total score (r = 0.82, p < 0.001), oculomotor (r = 0.52, p < 0.001), and speech (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) subscores, and patient reports of function including patient-reported outcome measures (PROM)-Ataxia (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) and the Dysarthria Impact Scale (DIS; r = 0.53, p < 0.001). The READ score detected subclinical oculomotor (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.69, p = 0.02) and speech signs (AUC = 0.72, p < 0.001) and disease progression (d = 0.36, p = 0.03). The BARS total did not reach statistical significance in capturing progression between study visits in this cohort (d = 0.27, p = 0.08).
interpretationDigital measures of eye movements are a promising approach for sensitively measuring ataxia in clinical trials (including early-stage disease) and may have utility in other neurodegenerative diseases affecting speech or ocular control. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:84-95.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40964858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.