ArticleGerodontology2026
Measuring Dry Mouth in Older People in Residential Care.
Article in Gerodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo investigate and describe the concordance between salivary flow rates and xerostomia among older dependent adults, describe the association between medication use and dry mouth, and describe the impact of dry mouth on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).
methodsA clinical examination survey was conducted with 50 older adults residing in residential care facilities in Dunedin, New Zealand. Xerostomia was measured using the five-item Summated Xerostomia Inventory-Dutch Version (SXI-D), and the unstimulated salivary flow rate was also measured. The clinical manifestations of oral dryness were evaluated using the Clinical Oral Dryness Scoring (CODS) scale. Medications were recorded.
resultsParticipants ranged in age from 65 to 99 years (mean 83.0, SD 9.1). The prevalence of xerostomia was 34.8%, while salivary gland hypofunction (SGH) was present in 26.1%. Only 13.0% of participants had both conditions, and 52.2% had neither. A weak negative correlation was observed between the SXI-D score and salivary flow rate (r = -0.20), while a moderate positive correlation was found between the SXI-D and the CODS scale (r = 0.55). Additionally, the CODS scale showed a moderate negative correlation with the salivary flow rate (r = -0.47).
conclusionDry mouth is common among older adults in residential care, but the relationship between its signs and symptoms is complex. Salivary hypofunction data alone do not fully capture the experience of oral dryness, emphasising the need for a more comprehensive approach to diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.