ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Silver diamine fluoride effectiveness in arresting initial approximal caries lesions in adults: A triple-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Despite the advancement in dental care, dental caries remains the most prevalent oral disease, necessitating the need for effective, preventive, and minimally invasive treatment options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in arresting initial approximal carious lesions in adults. Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two arms (A or B). One randomly selected lesion received either treatment (SDF solution) or placebo (water). Lesions were followed at 6- and 12-month using bitewing radiographs. Lesion progression was assessed via three evaluation methods: (1) pairwise comparison of bitewing radiographs (visual assessment), (2) assessment of subtraction radiographs (digital subtraction radiography [DSR]), and (3) histogram analysis of subtraction radiographs (HA). All the statistical analyses were performed using R software (the R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) at the 5% significance level. Results: Over 12-month period, more than 90% of the lesions were arrested in both groups. The SDF group performed significantly better according to the DSR method between baseline and 6 months (P = 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion: SDF treatment was superior in arresting initial approximal caries lesions during the first 6 months of use. This is significant for disease control in high-risk individuals who present to the clinic with multiple initial approximal caries lesions. Further studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.