ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Outcome of full pulpotomy versus partial radicular pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis using Biodentine - A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Partial radicular versus coronal pulpotomy using chitosan and platelet-rich fibrin in vital permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis, with or without associated apical periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Determinants of Definitive Full Pulpotomy Adoption in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Multivariable Analysis of Dental Trainee Decision-Making.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of vital pulp therapy versus root canal treatment in immature permanent teeth with pulpal involvement: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The constant demand for innovative and minimally invasive procedures aimed at preserving tooth structure challenges the effectiveness of conventional methods. One such approach is partial radicular pulpotomy, which necessitates further clinical trials to validate its efficacy over traditional full pulpectomies and root canal treatments. Aim: This study aims to evaluate and compare the outcome of full pulpotomy and partial radicular pulpotomy using Biodentine, in mature permanent molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and spontaneous pain. Methods: Fifty patients with exposed carious pulp and symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were included, aged 15-35 years, randomly allocated to two groups: full pulpotomy (Group I) and partial radicular pulpotomy (Group II). Both the pulpotomies were performed following standardized protocols, with Biodentine. Statistical analysis: Success was assessed clinically and radiographically for up to 12 months using the intragroup Friedman test and the intergroup Mann-Whitney test. Results: Group I exhibited 78.3%, while for Group II, it was 86.4% success at 12 months, but the results were nonsignificant ( Conclusion: Partial radicular pulpotomy can be introduced as a successful new treatment option in cases of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent molars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.