ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Antibacterial efficacy and molecular docking analysis of
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fermentation-Derived 6-Shogaol fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Computational evaluation of NOD-like receptor pyrin domain-containing 3 inflammasome inhibitors for endodontic inflammation: A molecular docking analysis of synthetic and phytochemical compounds.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aim and Objectives: To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of Materials and Methods: Extracts were prepared by powdering freshly dried ginger and garlic, and the extraction process was done using a Soxhlet apparatus. Broth microdilution assay and microtiter plate assay of the ginger and garlic extracts were done for evaluating antibacterial activity. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis was done to identify phytochemical constituents present in extracts responsible for antibacterial action. Molecular docking was done to evaluate the interaction between phytoconstituents and the target protein (NanA) of Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was done by IBM SPSS version 30.0. One-way ANOVA test was used for intergroup comparison. Results: The minimum inhibitory concentration was determined to be 0.9 μg/mL for ZO and AS extracts. Both Ginger and Garlic extract showed a dose-dependent activity on Conclusion: Garlic and ginger extracts both showed better antibacterial activity against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.