Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964624›Full record

ArticleJournal of data science : JDS2024

A Meta-Learner Framework to Estimate Individualized Treatment Effects for Survival Outcomes.

Na Bo, Yue Wei, Lang Zeng, Chaeryon Kang, Ying Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of data science : JDS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Na BoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
Yue WeiNovartis, China.
Lang ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
Chaeryon KangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
Ying DingDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, U.S.A.

Funding

New statistical methods and software for modeling complex multivariate survival data with large-scale covariatesR01GM141076 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DING, YING · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One crucial aspect of precision medicine is to allow physicians to recommend the most suitable treatment for their patients. This requires understanding the treatment heterogeneity from a patient-centric view, quantified by estimating the individualized treatment effect (ITE). With a large amount of genetics data and medical factors being collected, a complete picture of individuals' characteristics is forming, which provides more opportunities to accurately estimate ITE. Recent development using machine learning methods within the counterfactual outcome framework shows excellent potential in analyzing such data. In this research, we propose to extend meta-learning approaches to estimate individualized treatment effects with survival outcomes. Two meta-learning algorithms are considered, T-learner and X-learner, each combined with three types of machine learning methods: random survival forest, Bayesian accelerated failure time model and survival neural network. We examine the performance of the proposed methods and provide practical guidelines for their application in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Moreover, we propose to use the Boruta algorithm to identify risk factors that contribute to treatment heterogeneity based on ITE estimates. The finite sample performances of these methods are compared through extensive simulations under different randomization designs. The proposed approach is applied to a large RCT of eye disease, namely, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), to estimate the ITE on delaying time-to-AMD progression and to make individualized treatment recommendations.

Indexed as

age-related macular degenerationindividualized treatment effectprecision medicinerandomized clinical trialssurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40964624
PMCPMC12440118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.