Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964622›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2025

Bayesian Clustering via Fusing of Localized Densities.

Alexander Dombowsky, David B Dunson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Product Centred Dirichlet Processes for Bayesian Multiview Clustering.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander DombowskyDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.
David B DunsonDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Funding

Sepsis Characterization in KilimanjaroR01AI155733 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RUBACH, MATTHEW P · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Reproducibility and Robustness of Dimensionality ReductionR01ES027498 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Improving inferences on health effects of chemical exposuresR01ES035625 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI David Brian Dunson · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155733NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027498NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES035625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian clustering typically relies on mixture models, with each component interpreted as a different cluster. After defining a prior for the component parameters and weights, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms are commonly used to produce samples from the posterior distribution of the component labels. The data are then clustered by minimizing the expectation of a clustering loss function that favors similarity to the component labels. Unfortunately, although these approaches are routinely implemented, clustering results are highly sensitive to kernel misspecification. For example, if Gaussian kernels are used but the true density of data within a cluster is even slightly non-Gaussian, then clusters will be broken into multiple Gaussian components. To address this problem, we develop Fusing of Localized Densities (FOLD), a novel clustering method that melds components together using the posterior of the kernels. FOLD has a fully Bayesian decision theoretic justification, naturally leads to uncertainty quantification, can be easily implemented as an add-on to MCMC algorithms for mixtures, and favors a small number of distinct clusters. We provide theoretical support for FOLD including clustering optimality under kernel misspecification. In simulated experiments and real data, FOLD outperforms competitors by minimizing the number of clusters while inferring meaningful group structure. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

Indexed as

Decision theoryKernel misspecificationLoss functionMixture modelStatistical distance

Identifiers

PMID40964622
PMCPMC12440121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.