ReviewCureus2025
Diagnostic Role of Radiology in Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a major medical emergency with high morbidity and mortality. Endoscopy remains the first-line diagnostic and therapeutic approach, but radiological imaging has become increasingly important, particularly when endoscopy is inconclusive or unavailable. This review outlines the evolving role of radiological techniques, including computed tomography angiography (CTA), catheter-based angiography, radionuclide scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US), in the detection, localization, and management of acute GIB. CTA is now the preferred imaging modality because of its speed, noninvasive nature, and superior anatomical detail. Catheter angiography not only enables precise diagnosis but also provides therapeutic options through embolization. Nuclear medicine techniques offer high sensitivity for intermittent or low-rate bleeding, while MRI and US contribute complementary insights in select patient groups. An integrated approach that combines radiological, endoscopic, and surgical strategies improves decision-making, shortens time to intervention, and enhances patient outcomes. Recent advances, including dual-energy CT, AI-assisted imaging, and novel embolic agents, are expected to further strengthen both diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic potential. Understanding the strengths, limitations, and sequencing of these modalities is key to optimizing care for patients with acute GIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.