ArticleCureus2025
Dentists' Satisfaction With the Dental Amalgam Phase Down Training Programme.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental amalgam phase down (DAPD) has ushered in a paradigm shift towards the use of adhesive alternative restorative dental materials and dental caries prevention. The emergence of a new restorative practice model has created a gap among some dentists, highlighting the need to reorient their knowledge and skills.
objectivesThe objectives of this study were to assess dentists' level of satisfaction with a DAPD training programme and identify associations between sociodemographic characteristics and satisfaction levels, in Kenya, a low- and middle-income country. Materials and methods: A three-hour online training programme was developed, and a sample of n=260 dentists was targeted. Data were collected on socio-demographic characteristics and from thirteen 5-Likert scale questions that evaluated participants' satisfaction with the aims, usefulness, methodology, content and duration of the course. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, with frequencies and proportions for categorical sociodemographic information and level of satisfaction scores, while chi-square and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyse the influence of sociodemographic information on the level of satisfaction with the statistical significance level set at p=0.05.
resultsA total of 216 (83.1%) dentists participated and completed the online questionnaire at the end of training, which represents 28.8% of the dentists whose contact information was retrievable as of 2022. Of these, 141 (65.3%) were men, while 130 (60.2%) were aged between 20 and 40 years. The majority obtained their primary degree in Kenya (190; 88.0%) and practised restorative dentistry (187; 86.6%). The dentists rated the training highly. The scores ranged from 3.74 to 4.63 with an average score of 4.43 on the 5-point Likert scale, indicating that they were highly satisfied with the DAPD training programme. Multivariate logistic regression showed that age, gender, year of qualification, county of workstation and practising restorative dentistry were positively associated with satisfaction. Dentists who practised in the cities were more than six times likely to be satisfied (aOR 6.1; CI: [1.3-8.554], p=0.012). Gender was statistically significant, such that male dentists were more satisfied (aOR 3.1; CI: [1.6-3.65], p=0.019).
conclusionThe majority of the dentists were satisfied with the content of the training modules, mode of delivery and its usefulness in phasing down the use of dental amalgam. The strongest association was observed between practising restorative dentistry and satisfaction. Longitudinal training approaches to evaluate how satisfaction with training translates into changes in clinical practice would provide insight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.