ArticleCureus2025
Redefining Bladder Dissection in Robotic Hysterectomy with Previous Cesarean Section: A "Head-On Approach".
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative adhesions, particularly between the bladder and cesarean scar, as well as between the uterus and anterior abdominal wall, are commonly encountered in patients with a history of cesarean sections. These adhesions substantially elevate the risk of severe intraoperative complications, including bowel or bladder injuries, during hysterectomy. The incidence of bladder complications is significantly lower in patients with one or two prior cesarean sections compared to those with three or more. Moreover, the likelihood of inadvertent cystotomy is several times higher in patients with three or more cesarean sections than in those with no prior cesarean sections. Here, we report a simple, safe, and reproducible
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.