Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964449›Full record

ArticlePsychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity2024

Sexual and Gender Minority College Students' Perceptions of Sexuality Blindfolding.

Rebecca Cipollina, Katie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca CipollinaCenter for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS at Yale University.
Katie WangDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health.

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY HIV PREVENTION TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH020031 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Trace S Kershaw · 1999 to 2026
$12.1M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexuality blindfolding is a diversity philosophy in which discussions and recognition of LGBTQ identities are minimized with aims of reducing intergroup tension. To add to prior evidence showing the unintended harms of difference-evading diversity philosophies, the present research documented LGBTQ college students' perceptions of sexuality blindfolding in undergraduate academic settings. Using thematic analysis on the qualitative entries of 45 LGBTQ college students in the U.S., the present research documented high disapproval of sexuality blindfolding, with students expressing that such approach a) causes identity invisibility and damage, b) signals that LGBTQ persons are deviant, and c) supports ignorance and maintains bias against LGBTQ people. Within these three major themes, additional subthemes indicate the perceived dangers of sexuality blindfolding for LGBTQ equality pursuits, LGBTQ student belonging, and academic success. Our inquiry also provided descriptive data on the frequency of participants' personal experiences with sexuality blindfolding (e.g., encountered situations where LGBTQ identities were minimized, dismissed, or avoided when brought up). Overall, the study highlights sexuality blindfolding as having negative consequences for societal progress and LGBTQ students' identity development, while contributing to broader discussions on diversity philosophies and state-level education policies that take an identity-conscious or difference-evading approach to diversity.

Indexed as

collegediversity ideologiesidentity-consciousnessinclusionLGBTQsexual and gender minorities

Identifiers

PMID40964449
PMCPMC12439761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.