ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Biomaterials strategy for promoting palatal wound healing.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Full-Thickness Regeneration of the Hard Palate Using Bioengineered Mucoperiosteal Scaffolds in a Porcine Model.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Healing in Oral Surgical Procedures: A Review on Biomaterials, Growth Factors, and Tissue Engineering.Cureus · 2026Review
- Plant Exosome Injection: A New Boost for Postlaser Vascular Repair.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Palatal wounds arising from trauma, tumors, cleft palate, or free gingival grafting (FGG) and other etiologies compromise critical orofacial functions including mastication, deglutition phonation and articulation, while posing life-threatening risks in severe conditions. Although surgical resection remains the primary clinical intervention, current treatment strategies for palatal injuries are constrained by several limitations, including: bacterial contamination and chronic inflammation, extensive soft tissue defects, postoperative scar formation, compromised blood supply in the surgical field, and potential patient comorbidities. Research on wound healing based on biomaterials has advanced substantially in recent decades, significantly facilitating their application in tissue engineering. This review provides a comprehensive overview of biomaterials used in palatal wounds, including acellular dermal matrix (ADM), platelet-rich derivatives (e.g., PRF, PRP), amniotic membrane, growth factor, hyaluronic acid, collagen, novel hydrogel, nanofiber scaffolds and other relevant materials. It further discusses potential mechanisms that may be involved in palatal wound healing. The objectives of this review are to summarize recent advances in preclinical and clinical studies on biomaterials for palatal wound healing and to highlight their therapeutic potential in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.