ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Deep learning model using cross-sequence learning to identify orbital fractures in radiographs of patients under 20 Years.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orbit fractures under 20 years are a medical emergency requiring urgent surgery with the gold standard modality being high-resolution CT. If radiography could be used to identify patients without fractures, the number of unnecessary CT scans could be reduced. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a deep learning-based multi-input model with a novel cross-sequence learning method, which outperforms the conventional single-input models, to detect orbital fractures on radiographs of young patients. Development datasets for this retrospective study were acquired from two hospitals (n = 904 and n = 910). The datasets included patients with facial trauma who underwent orbital rim view and CT. The development dataset was split into training, tuning, and internal test sets in 7:1:2 ratios. A radiology resident, pediatric radiologist, and ophthalmic surgeon participated in a two-session observer study examining an internal test set, with or without model assistance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained. Our proposed model detected orbital fractures with an AUROC of 0.802. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the model achieved 65.8, 86.5, 70.9, and 83.5%, respectively. With model assistance, all values for orbital fracture detection improved for the ophthalmic surgeon, with a statistically significant difference in specificity (P < 0.001). For the radiology resident, specificity exhibited significant improvement with model assistance (P < 0.001). Our proposed model was able to identify orbital fractures on radiographs, reducing unnecessary CT scans and radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.